Azerbaijan vs Sweden: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Azerbaijan
74.06
in 2019
Sweden
73.78
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
65th
Sweden rank
68th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Sweden
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 74.06 against 73.78 in Sweden, a difference of 0.28.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sweden ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 65th and Sweden ranks 68th of 188 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 48.7 65.13 16.43 Sweden
2010s 54.99 72.05 17.06 Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Azerbaijan or Sweden?
Azerbaijan, at 74.06 against 73.78 in Sweden as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Azerbaijan and Sweden?
0.28, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Sweden?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Azerbaijan and Sweden rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Azerbaijan ranks 65th and Sweden ranks 68th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.