Bangladesh vs Romania: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Bangladesh
28.67
in 2019
Romania
32.56
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
171st
Romania rank
169th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Romania
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Romania currently reports 32.56 against 28.67 in Bangladesh, a difference of 3.89.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 171st and Romania ranks 169th of 188 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 23.17 51.7 28.53 Romania
2010s 28.2 40.23 12.03 Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Bangladesh or Romania?
Romania, at 32.56 against 28.67 in Bangladesh as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Bangladesh and Romania?
3.89, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Romania?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Bangladesh and Romania rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Bangladesh ranks 171st and Romania ranks 169th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.