Burundi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Burundi
87.32
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
88.18
in 2019
Burundi rank
14th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
12th
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- Burundi
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 88.18 against 87.32 in Burundi, a difference of 0.86.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 14th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 12th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.3 | 43.8 | 24.5 | Burundi |
| 2010s | 79.34 | 82.54 | 3.2 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Burundi or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 88.18 against 87.32 in Burundi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Burundi and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.86, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Burundi and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Burundi ranks 14th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 12th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.