Cabo Verde vs Kazakhstan: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Cabo Verde
78.39
in 2019
Kazakhstan
77.95
in 2019
Cabo Verde rank
46th
Kazakhstan rank
49th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Kazakhstan
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Cabo Verde currently reports 78.39 against 77.95 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.44.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Cabo Verde has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 46th and Kazakhstan ranks 49th of 188 countries.

Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 61.1 32.74 28.36 Cabo Verde
2010s 71.1 58.83 12.26 Cabo Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Cabo Verde or Kazakhstan?
Cabo Verde, at 78.39 against 77.95 in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Cabo Verde and Kazakhstan?
0.44, with Cabo Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Kazakhstan?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Cabo Verde and Kazakhstan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Cabo Verde ranks 46th and Kazakhstan ranks 49th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.