Djibouti vs Malaysia: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Djibouti
65.42
in 2019
Malaysia
95.68
in 2019
Djibouti rank
1st
Malaysia rank
4th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Djibouti
  • Malaysia
20406080100200520122019

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 95.68 against 65.42 in Djibouti, a difference of 30.26.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.5 times Djibouti's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Djibouti ahead.

Djibouti ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 4th of 1 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Malaysia Difference Ahead
2000s 52.74 28.13 24.61 Djibouti
2010s 60.09 76.89 16.8 Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Djibouti or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 95.68 against 65.42 in Djibouti as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Djibouti and Malaysia?
30.26, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Malaysia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Djibouti and Malaysia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Djibouti ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 4th of 1 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.