Korea, Rep. vs Malaysia: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Korea, Rep.
99.57
in 2019
Malaysia
95.68
in 2019
Korea, Rep. rank
1st
Malaysia rank
4th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Korea, Rep.
  • Malaysia
20406080100200520122019

How they compare

Korea, Rep. currently reports 99.57 against 95.68 in Malaysia, a difference of 3.89.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Korea, Rep. has been ahead every year.

Korea, Rep. ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 4th of 188 countries.

Korea, Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea, Rep. Malaysia Difference Ahead
2000s 98.79 28.13 70.66 Korea, Rep.
2010s 99.52 76.89 22.64 Korea, Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Korea, Rep. or Malaysia?
Korea, Rep., at 99.57 against 95.68 in Malaysia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Korea, Rep. and Malaysia?
3.89, with Korea, Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea, Rep. and Malaysia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Korea, Rep. and Malaysia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Korea, Rep. ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 4th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.