Kosovo vs Marshall Islands: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Kosovo
39.19
in 2019
Marshall Islands
96.54
in 2019
Kosovo rank
1st
Marshall Islands rank
3rd

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Kosovo
  • Marshall Islands
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 96.54 against 39.19 in Kosovo, a difference of 57.35.

That makes Marshall Islands's figure about 2.5 times Kosovo's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.

Kosovo ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 3rd of 1 groups.

Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kosovo Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 0 92.22 92.22 Marshall Islands
2010s 30.61 95.68 65.07 Marshall Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Kosovo or Marshall Islands?
Marshall Islands, at 96.54 against 39.19 in Kosovo as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Kosovo and Marshall Islands?
57.35, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Marshall Islands?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Kosovo and Marshall Islands rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Kosovo ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 3rd of 1 groups.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.