Mauritania vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Mauritania
77.52
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
77.23
in 2019
Mauritania rank
52nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
54th
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- Mauritania
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 77.52 against 77.23 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.29.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Mauritania ranks 52nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 54th of 190 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.4 | 77.23 | 13.83 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 76.11 | 77.23 | 1.12 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Mauritania or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Mauritania, at 77.52 against 77.23 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Mauritania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.29, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Mauritania and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Mauritania ranks 52nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 54th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.