New Zealand vs North Macedonia: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
New Zealand
80.69
in 2019
North Macedonia
81.27
in 2019
New Zealand rank
35th
North Macedonia rank
32nd
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 81.27 against 80.69 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.58.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 35th and North Macedonia ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.69 | 57.75 | 22.94 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 80.69 | 79.28 | 1.41 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, New Zealand or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 81.27 against 80.69 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between New Zealand and North Macedonia?
- 0.58, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and North Macedonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and North Macedonia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 35th and North Macedonia ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.