New Zealand vs Rwanda: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

New Zealand
80.69
in 2019
Rwanda
79.54
in 2019
New Zealand rank
35th
Rwanda rank
37th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • New Zealand
  • Rwanda
20406080200520122019

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 80.69 against 79.54 in Rwanda, a difference of 1.15.

Across all 15 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 35th and Rwanda ranks 37th of 188 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 80.69 42.02 38.67 New Zealand
2010s 80.69 71.3 9.39 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, New Zealand or Rwanda?
New Zealand, at 80.69 against 79.54 in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between New Zealand and Rwanda?
1.15, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Rwanda?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do New Zealand and Rwanda rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
New Zealand ranks 35th and Rwanda ranks 37th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.