Romania vs Trinidad and Tobago: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Romania
32.56
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
34.29
in 2019
Romania rank
171st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
169th
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- Romania
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 34.29 against 32.56 in Romania, a difference of 1.73.
That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 171st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 169th of 190 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.7 | 34.29 | 17.41 | Romania |
| 2010s | 40.23 | 34.29 | 5.94 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Romania or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 34.29 against 32.56 in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Romania and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 1.73, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Romania and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Romania ranks 171st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 169th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.