Samoa vs United Arab Emirates: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Samoa
91.07
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
93.8
in 2019
Samoa rank
6th
United Arab Emirates rank
5th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Samoa
  • United Arab Emirates
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 93.8 against 91.07 in Samoa, a difference of 2.73.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Samoa ahead.

Samoa ranks 6th and United Arab Emirates ranks 5th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2000s 91.07 85.56 5.5 Samoa
2010s 91.07 93.59 2.52 United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Samoa or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 93.8 against 91.07 in Samoa as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Samoa and United Arab Emirates?
2.73, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and United Arab Emirates?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Samoa and United Arab Emirates rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Samoa ranks 6th and United Arab Emirates ranks 5th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.