Saudi Arabia vs Solomon Islands: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Saudi Arabia
78.67
in 2019
Solomon Islands
78.96
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
44th
Solomon Islands rank
41st

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Solomon Islands
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 78.96 against 78.67 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.29.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.

Saudi Arabia ranks 44th and Solomon Islands ranks 41st of 188 countries.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 64.9 78.96 14.06 Solomon Islands
2010s 76.97 78.96 1.99 Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Saudi Arabia or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 78.96 against 78.67 in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Saudi Arabia and Solomon Islands?
0.29, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Solomon Islands?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Saudi Arabia and Solomon Islands rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Saudi Arabia ranks 44th and Solomon Islands ranks 41st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.