Afghanistan vs Cameroon: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score

Afghanistan
43.75
in 2013
Cameroon
43.75
in 2013
Afghanistan rank
117th
Cameroon rank
117th

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Cameroon
10203040200420082013

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 43.75 against 43.75 in Cameroon, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Cameroon ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 117th and Cameroon ranks 117th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Cameroon in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Cameroon Difference Ahead
2000s 11.46 18.75 7.29 Cameroon
2010s 39.06 35.94 3.12 Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Afghanistan or Cameroon?
Afghanistan, at 43.75 against 43.75 in Cameroon as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Afghanistan and Cameroon?
0, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Cameroon?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
How do Afghanistan and Cameroon rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
Afghanistan ranks 117th and Cameroon ranks 117th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,785 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.