Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan
Afghanistan: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score was 43.75 in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan, 2004–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score in Afghanistan is 43.75, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 16.7% on the previous year and up 600.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score in Afghanistan peaked at 43.75 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 6.25, in 2004.
That places Afghanistan 119th out of 184 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 6.25 | — |
| 2005 | 6.25 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 6.25 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 6.25 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 6.25 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 37.5 | +500.0% |
| 2010 | 37.5 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 37.5 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 37.5 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 43.75 | +16.7% |
Afghanistan compared with similar countries
- Afghanistan's 43.75 is above the median for low income countries, which is 37.5, 1.2× the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Afghanistan's 43.75 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 43.75, 1.0× the median. (21 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.46 | 6.25 | 37.5 | 6 |
| 2010s | 39.06 | 37.5 | 43.75 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Afghanistan
- 119 Pakistan 43.75 compare
- 119 Antigua and Barbuda 43.75 compare
- 119 Bahrain 43.75 compare
- 119 Belarus 43.75 compare
- 119 Belize 43.75 compare
- 119 Cape Verde 43.75 compare
- 119 Cameroon 43.75 compare
- 119 Grenada 43.75 compare
- 119 Kuwait 43.75 compare
- 119 Malawi 43.75 compare
- 119 Qatar 43.75 compare
- 119 Samoa 43.75 compare
- 119 Sierra Leone 43.75 compare
- 119 Slovenia 43.75 compare
- 119 Saint Lucia 43.75 compare
- 119 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 43.75 compare
- 119 Tanzania 43.75 compare
- 119 Uzbekistan 43.75 compare
- 119 Venezuela 43.75 compare
More private sector data for Afghanistan
- Merchandise trade 22.2% (2025)
- Food imports 26.9% (2019)
- Manufactures imports 41.1% (2019)
- Merchandise imports 3.61 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 63.9% (2019)
- Manufactures exports 4.8% (2019)
- Merchandise exports 926.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 21.12 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.0517 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 0.7617 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score in Afghanistan?
- Getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score in Afghanistan was 43.75 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score recorded in Afghanistan?
- The highest recorded value was 43.75 in 2013.
- What is the lowest getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score recorded in Afghanistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 6.25 in 2004.
- How does Afghanistan rank for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 119th out of 184 countries with data for 2013.
- Is getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Afghanistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 600.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.