Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs St. Lucia: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
43.75
in 2013
St. Lucia
43.75
in 2013
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of rank
118th
St. Lucia rank
118th
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
- St. Lucia
How they compare
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of currently reports 43.75 against 43.75 in St. Lucia, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, St. Lucia has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 118th and St. Lucia ranks 118th of 183 countries.
St. Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of | St. Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.5 | 43.75 | 31.25 | St. Lucia |
| 2010s | 39.06 | 43.75 | 4.69 | St. Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of or St. Lucia?
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, at 43.75 against 43.75 in St. Lucia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and St. Lucia?
- 0, with Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and St. Lucia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and St. Lucia rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 118th and St. Lucia ranks 118th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.