Bahrain, Kingdom of vs Uzbekistan, Republic of: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Bahrain, Kingdom of
- Uzbekistan, Republic of
How they compare
Bahrain, Kingdom of currently reports 43.75 against 43.75 in Uzbekistan, Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bahrain, Kingdom of ahead.
Bahrain, Kingdom of ranks 118th and Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 118th of 183 countries.
Bahrain, Kingdom of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain, Kingdom of | Uzbekistan, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.5 | 12.5 | 25 | Bahrain, Kingdom of |
| 2010s | 39.06 | 31.25 | 7.81 | Bahrain, Kingdom of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Bahrain, Kingdom of or Uzbekistan, Republic of?
- Bahrain, Kingdom of, at 43.75 against 43.75 in Uzbekistan, Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Bahrain, Kingdom of and Uzbekistan, Republic of?
- 0, with Bahrain, Kingdom of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain, Kingdom of and Uzbekistan, Republic of?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2013.
- How do Bahrain, Kingdom of and Uzbekistan, Republic of rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Bahrain, Kingdom of ranks 118th and Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 118th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.