Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score was 43.75 in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score in Uzbekistan, 2004–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2013, getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score in Uzbekistan stood at 43.75. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
That represents a change of up 16.7% on the previous year and up 250.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score in Uzbekistan peaked at 43.75 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 12.5, in 2004.
Uzbekistan ranks 119th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 12.5 | — |
| 2005 | 12.5 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 12.5 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 12.5 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 12.5 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 12.5 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 12.5 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 31.25 | +150.0% |
| 2012 | 37.5 | +20.0% |
| 2013 | 43.75 | +16.7% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's 43.75 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 43.75, 1.0× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's 43.75 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 71.88, 61% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 6 |
| 2010s | 31.25 | 12.5 | 43.75 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
- 119 Pakistan 43.75 compare
- 119 Afghanistan 43.75 compare
- 119 Antigua and Barbuda 43.75 compare
- 119 Bahrain 43.75 compare
- 119 Belarus 43.75 compare
- 119 Belize 43.75 compare
- 119 Cape Verde 43.75 compare
- 119 Cameroon 43.75 compare
- 119 Grenada 43.75 compare
- 119 Kuwait 43.75 compare
- 119 Malawi 43.75 compare
- 119 Qatar 43.75 compare
- 119 Samoa 43.75 compare
- 119 Sierra Leone 43.75 compare
- 119 Slovenia 43.75 compare
- 119 Saint Lucia 43.75 compare
- 119 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 43.75 compare
- 119 Tanzania 43.75 compare
- 119 Venezuela 43.75 compare
More private sector data for Uzbekistan
- Merchandise trade 44.5% (2025)
- Food imports 12.4% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 71.9% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 41.75 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 11.4% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 29.0% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 23.65 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 638.38 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1609 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 20.08 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score in Uzbekistan?
- Getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score in Uzbekistan was 43.75 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 43.75 in 2013.
- What is the lowest getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.5 in 2004.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Uzbekistan ranks 119th out of 184 countries with data for 2013.
- Is getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 250.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.