Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Hong Kong, China
93.75
in 2013
Latvia
93.75
in 2013
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd
Latvia rank
3rd
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Latvia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 93.75 against 93.75 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Latvia ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.75 | 67.71 | 26.04 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 93.75 | 93.75 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score, Hong Kong, China or Latvia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 93.75 against 93.75 in Latvia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score between Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 0, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Latvia rank globally for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Latvia ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.