Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score in Latvia

Latvia: Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score was 93.75 in 2013. ▲ Rising

Latest (2013)
93.75
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
3rd
of 184 countries
All-time high
93.75
in 2009
All-time low
62.5
in 2004
Years of data
10
2004–2013

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score in Latvia, 2004–2013

0204060801002004200820132004: 62.52005: 62.52006: 62.52007: 62.52008: 62.52009: 93.82010: 93.82011: 93.82012: 93.82013: 93.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score in Latvia is 93.75, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.

The figure is up 50.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score in Latvia peaked at 93.75 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 62.5, in 2004.

That places Latvia 3rd out of 184 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score in Latvia, 2004 to 2013.
Year Value Change
2004 62.5 —
2005 62.5 +0.0%
2006 62.5 +0.0%
2007 62.5 +0.0%
2008 62.5 +0.0%
2009 93.75 +50.0%
2010 93.75 +0.0%
2011 93.75 +0.0%
2012 93.75 +0.0%
2013 93.75 +0.0%

Latvia compared with similar countries

  • Latvia's 93.75 is above the median for high income countries, which is 68.75, 1.4× the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Latvia's 93.75 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 71.88, 1.3× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 67.71 62.5 93.75 6
2010s 93.75 93.75 93.75 4

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 1 Malaysia 100 compare
  2. 1 United Kingdom 100 compare
  3. 3 United States 93.75 compare
  4. 3 Australia 93.75 compare
  5. 3 Georgia 93.75 compare
  6. 3 Hong Kong 93.75 compare
  7. 3 New Zealand 93.75 compare
  8. 3 Poland 93.75 compare
  9. 3 Puerto Rico 93.75 compare
  10. 3 Singapore 93.75 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More private sector data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score in Latvia?
Getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score in Latvia was 93.75 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 93.75 in 2009.
What is the lowest getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 62.5 in 2004.
How does Latvia rank for getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score?
Latvia ranks 3rd out of 184 countries with data for 2013.
Is getting credit (db05-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is up 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score in Latvia. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-credit-db05-14-methodology-score/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-credit-db05-14-methodology-score/latvia/">Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit (DB05-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,790 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The score for getting credit benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.