Brunei Darussalam vs Tunisia: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Brunei Darussalam
66.67
in 2013
Tunisia
66.67
in 2013
Brunei Darussalam rank
85th
Tunisia rank
85th
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Tunisia
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 85th and Tunisia ranks 85th of 184 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 45.83 | 45.83 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 16.67 | 66.67 | 50 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Brunei Darussalam or Tunisia?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Tunisia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Brunei Darussalam and Tunisia?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Tunisia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2013.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Tunisia rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 85th and Tunisia ranks 85th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.