Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) in Tunisia
Tunisia: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) was 66.67 in 2013. ▲ Rising
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) in Tunisia, 2004–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2013, getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in Tunisia stood at 66.67. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
The figure is up 300.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in Tunisia peaked at 66.67 in 2008 and was at its lowest, 16.67, in 2004.
Tunisia ranks 85th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 16.67 | — |
| 2005 | 16.67 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 16.67 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 33.33 | +100.0% |
| 2008 | 66.67 | +100.0% |
| 2009 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.11 | 16.67 | 66.67 | 6 |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 66.67 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
- 85 Bahrain 66.67 compare
- 85 Belgium 66.67 compare
- 85 Bosnia and Herzegovina 66.67 compare
- 85 Brunei 66.67 compare
- 85 Bulgaria 66.67 compare
- 85 Cambodia 66.67 compare
- 85 Denmark 66.67 compare
- 85 Eswatini 66.67 compare
- 85 Fiji 66.67 compare
- 85 Finland 66.67 compare
- 85 France 66.67 compare
- 85 Hungary 66.67 compare
- 85 Kyrgyzstan 66.67 compare
- 85 Maldives 66.67 compare
- 85 Montenegro 66.67 compare
- 85 Namibia 66.67 compare
- 85 Netherlands 66.67 compare
- 85 Norway 66.67 compare
- 85 Philippines 66.67 compare
- 85 Qatar 66.67 compare
- 85 Sao Tome and Principe 66.67 compare
- 85 Slovakia 66.67 compare
- 85 Sweden 66.67 compare
- 85 Trinidad and Tobago 66.67 compare
- 85 Vietnam 66.67 compare
More private sector data for Tunisia
- Merchandise trade 86.8% (2025)
- Food imports 11.5% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 63.7% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 28.59 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 14.7% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 77.3% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 21.29 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 1,724 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.3703 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 6.61 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in Tunisia?
- Getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in Tunisia was 66.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 66.67 in 2008.
- What is the lowest getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 16.67 in 2004.
- How does Tunisia rank for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Tunisia ranks 85th out of 184 countries with data for 2013.
- Is getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 300.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.