Eswatini vs Kyrgyzstan: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14)
Eswatini
66.67
in 2013
Kyrgyzstan
66.67
in 2013
Eswatini rank
85th
Kyrgyzstan rank
85th
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) over time
- Eswatini
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 85th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 85th of 184 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 13.33 | 53.33 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14), Eswatini or Kyrgyzstan?
- Eswatini, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) between Eswatini and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Eswatini and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Eswatini ranks 85th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 85th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.