Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) in Eswatini
Eswatini: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) was 66.67 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) in Eswatini, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Eswatini recorded 66.67 for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in Eswatini peaked at 66.67 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 66.67, in 2005.
That places Eswatini 85th out of 184 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 66.67 | — |
| 2006 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 66.67 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 66.67 | 5 |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 66.67 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 85 Bahrain 66.67 compare
- 85 Belgium 66.67 compare
- 85 Bosnia and Herzegovina 66.67 compare
- 85 Brunei Darussalam 66.67 compare
- 85 Bulgaria 66.67 compare
- 85 Cambodia 66.67 compare
- 85 Denmark 66.67 compare
- 85 Fiji 66.67 compare
- 85 Finland 66.67 compare
- 85 France 66.67 compare
- 85 Hungary 66.67 compare
- 85 Kyrgyzstan 66.67 compare
- 85 Maldives 66.67 compare
- 85 Montenegro 66.67 compare
- 85 Namibia 66.67 compare
- 85 Netherlands 66.67 compare
- 85 Norway 66.67 compare
- 85 Philippines 66.67 compare
- 85 Qatar 66.67 compare
- 85 Sao Tome and Principe 66.67 compare
- 85 Slovakia 66.67 compare
- 85 Sweden 66.67 compare
- 85 Trinidad and Tobago 66.67 compare
- 85 Tunisia 66.67 compare
- 85 Viet Nam 66.67 compare
More private sector data for Eswatini
- Merchandise trade 86.4% (2025)
- Food imports 19.6% (2023)
- Manufactures imports 58.1% (2023)
- Merchandise imports 2.09 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 29.7% (2023)
- Manufactures exports 59.8% (2023)
- Merchandise exports 2.37 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 1,887 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.4592 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 1.85 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in Eswatini?
- Getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in Eswatini was 66.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 66.67 in 2005.
- What is the lowest getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 66.67 in 2005.
- How does Eswatini rank for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Eswatini ranks 85th out of 184 countries with data for 2013.
- Is getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.