Russian Federation vs Chinese Taipei: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Russian Federation
50
in 2013
Chinese Taipei
50
in 2013
Russian Federation rank
112th
Chinese Taipei rank
112th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Russian Federation
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 50 against 50 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 112th and Chinese Taipei ranks 112th of 184 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 43.33 | 6.67 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Russian Federation or Chinese Taipei?
- Russian Federation, at 50 against 50 in Chinese Taipei as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Russian Federation and Chinese Taipei?
- 0, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Chinese Taipei?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Russian Federation and Chinese Taipei rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Russian Federation ranks 112th and Chinese Taipei ranks 112th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.