Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) in Taiwan, China
Taiwan, China: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) was 50 in 2013. ▲ Rising
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) in Taiwan, China, 2004–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) in Taiwan, China is 50, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 25.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) in Taiwan, China peaked at 50 in 2008 and was at its lowest, 40, in 2004.
That places Taiwan, China 112th out of 184 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) in Taiwan, China, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 40 | — |
| 2005 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 50 | +25.0% |
| 2009 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 50 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.33 | 40 | 50 | 6 |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 50 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Taiwan, China
- 112 Indonesia 50 compare
- 112 Pakistan 50 compare
- 112 Russian Federation 50 compare
- 112 Azerbaijan 50 compare
- 112 Belgium 50 compare
- 112 Bosnia and Herzegovina 50 compare
- 112 El Salvador 50 compare
- 112 France 50 compare
- 112 Gambia 50 compare
- 112 Iran, Islamic Republic of 50 compare
- 112 Panama 50 compare
- 112 Papua New Guinea 50 compare
- 112 Sri Lanka 50 compare
- 112 Thailand 50 compare
More private sector data for Taiwan, China
- Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) 100.0% (2019)
- Starting a business: Minimum capital 0.0% (2019)
- Starting a business: Cost - Women (% of income per capita) - Score 99.1% (2019)
- Starting a business: Cost - Men (% of income per capita) - Score 99.1% (2019)
- Starting a business: Time - Women 10 days (2019)
- Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score 90.45 (2019)
- Starting a business: Time - Men 10 days (2019)
- Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score 90.45 (2019)
- Starting a business: Procedures required - Women 3 number (2019)
- Starting a business: Procedures required - Women (number) - Score 88.24 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) in Taiwan, China?
- Getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) in Taiwan, China was 50 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) recorded in Taiwan, China?
- The highest recorded value was 50 in 2008.
- What is the lowest getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) recorded in Taiwan, China?
- The lowest recorded value was 40 in 2004.
- How does Taiwan, China rank for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Taiwan, China ranks 112th out of 184 countries with data for 2013.
- Is getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) rising or falling in Taiwan, China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Taiwan, China data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.