Sri Lanka vs Chinese Taipei: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Sri Lanka
50
in 2013
Chinese Taipei
50
in 2013
Sri Lanka rank
112th
Chinese Taipei rank
112th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 50 against 50 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Chinese Taipei has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 112th and Chinese Taipei ranks 112th of 184 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 43.33 | 10 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 45 | 50 | 5 | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Sri Lanka or Chinese Taipei?
- Sri Lanka, at 50 against 50 in Chinese Taipei as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Sri Lanka and Chinese Taipei?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Chinese Taipei?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Sri Lanka and Chinese Taipei rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Sri Lanka ranks 112th and Chinese Taipei ranks 112th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.