Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Tanzania: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index … 0-10 DB05-14 Score
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
70
in 2013
Tanzania
70
in 2013
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
52nd
Tanzania rank
52nd
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index … 0-10 DB05-14 Score over time
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Tanzania
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 70 against 70 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 52nd and Tanzania ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 70 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 70 | 70 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Tanzania?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 70 against 70 in Tanzania as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Tanzania?
- 0, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Tanzania?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Tanzania rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 52nd and Tanzania ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.