Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index … 0-10 DB05-14 Score in Tanzania
Tanzania: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index … 0-10 DB05-14 Score was 70 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) in Tanzania, 2004–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Tanzania recorded 70 for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) in 2013. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) in Tanzania peaked at 70 in 2004 and was at its lowest, 70, in 2004.
Tanzania ranks 52nd of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index … 0-10 DB05-14 Score in Tanzania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 70 | — |
| 2005 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 70 | +0.0% |
Tanzania compared with similar countries
- Tanzania's 70 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 60, 1.2× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Tanzania's 70 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 60, 1.2× the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 70 | 70 | 6 |
| 2010s | 70 | 70 | 70 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania
- 52 Japan 70 compare
- 52 Afghanistan 70 compare
- 52 Antigua and Barbuda 70 compare
- 52 Belize 70 compare
- 52 Brunei 70 compare
- 52 Canada 70 compare
- 52 Croatia 70 compare
- 52 Estonia 70 compare
- 52 Fiji 70 compare
- 52 Germany 70 compare
- 52 Grenada 70 compare
- 52 Hungary 70 compare
- 52 Lithuania 70 compare
- 52 Malawi 70 compare
- 52 Namibia 70 compare
- 52 Peru 70 compare
- 52 Samoa 70 compare
- 52 Sierra Leone 70 compare
- 52 South Africa 70 compare
- 52 Saint Lucia 70 compare
- 52 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 70 compare
- 52 Vietnam 70 compare
- 52 Zimbabwe 70 compare
More private sector data for Tanzania
- Merchandise trade 27.5% (2025)
- Food imports 8.2% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 73.7% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 14.81 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 2.70 billion current US$ (2024)
- Food exports 31.0% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 11.4% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 9.96 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 6.80 billion current US$ (2024)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 141.13 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) in Tanzania?
- Getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) in Tanzania was 70 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) recorded in Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 70 in 2004.
- What is the lowest getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) recorded in Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was 70 in 2004.
- How does Tanzania rank for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Tanzania ranks 52nd out of 184 countries with data for 2013.
- Is getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) rising or falling in Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.