Afghanistan vs China: Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1)
Afghanistan
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
China
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
1st
China rank
1st
Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) over time
- Afghanistan
- China
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in China, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 1st and China ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1), Afghanistan or China?
- Afghanistan, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) between Afghanistan and China?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and China?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and China rank globally for getting electricity: communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1)?
- Afghanistan ranks 1st and China ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The communication of tariffs and tariff changes index evaluates whether electricity tariffs are transparent. A score of 1 is assigned if effective tariffs are available online and customers are notified of a change in tariff a full billing cycle (that is, one month) ahead of time. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.