Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology) by country

The communication of tariffs and tariff changes index evaluates whether electricity tariffs are transparent. A score of 1 is assigned if effective tariffs are available online and customers are notified of a change in tariff a full billing cycle (that is, one month) ahead of time. The index is computed based on the...

Countries reporting
152
Highest
1 DB16-20 methodology
Afghanistan
Lowest
0 DB16-20 methodology
Sierra Leone
Median
1 DB16-20 methodology
Years covered
6
2014–2019
Data points
1,122

What the numbers show

Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology) is currently reported for 152 countries. The highest value is 1 DB16-20 methodology in Afghanistan; the lowest is 0 DB16-20 methodology in Sierra Leone.

The median across all reporting countries is 1 DB16-20 methodology, and the mean is 0.9934 DB16-20 methodology.

Over the past decade 1 countries rose and 1 fell. The largest increase was in Nigeria (up 29.9%), and the largest decrease in Sierra Leone (down 100.0%).

Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff … 0-1: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Afghanistan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
1 Albania 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 United Arab Emirates 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Argentina 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Armenia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Antigua and Barbuda 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Australia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Austria 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Azerbaijan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Burundi 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged falling
1 Belgium 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Benin 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Burkina Faso 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Bulgaria 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Bahrain 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Bahamas 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Belarus 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Belize 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Bolivia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Brazil 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Barbados 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Brunei 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Bhutan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Botswana 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Canada 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Switzerland 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Chile 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 China 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
1 Cote d'Ivoire 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
1 Cameroon 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
1 Colombia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Costa Rica 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Cyprus 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Czechia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Germany 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Djibouti 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Dominica 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Denmark 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Dominican Republic 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Algeria 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
1 Ecuador 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Spain 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Estonia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Finland 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Fiji 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 France 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 United Kingdom 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Georgia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Ghana 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Guinea 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
1 Gambia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Greece 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Grenada 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
1 Guatemala 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Guyana 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Hong Kong 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Honduras 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Croatia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Haiti 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Hungary 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 India 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Ireland 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Iran 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Iceland 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Italy 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Jamaica 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Jordan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Japan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Kazakhstan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Kenya 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Kyrgyzstan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Cambodia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 South Korea 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Kuwait 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Laos 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Lebanon 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Saint Lucia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Sri Lanka 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Lesotho 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Lithuania 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Luxembourg 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Latvia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Morocco 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Moldova 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Madagascar 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Maldives 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Mexico 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Marshall Islands 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 North Macedonia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Malta 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Myanmar 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
1 Montenegro 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Mongolia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Mozambique 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Mauritania 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Mauritius 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Malawi 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Malaysia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Namibia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Niger 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
1 Nigeria 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 29.9% rising
1 Nicaragua 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Netherlands 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Nepal 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 New Zealand 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Oman 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Pakistan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
1 Panama 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Peru 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Palau 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
1 Papua New Guinea 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged falling
1 Poland 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Puerto Rico 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Paraguay 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Palestine 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Romania 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Russia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Rwanda 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Sudan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — rising
1 Senegal 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
1 El Salvador 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 San Marino 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Serbia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Suriname 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Slovakia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Slovenia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Sweden 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Eswatini 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Syria 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Togo 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Thailand 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
1 Tajikistan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Trinidad and Tobago 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Tunisia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Turkey 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Tanzania 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Uganda 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Ukraine 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Uruguay 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 United States 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Uzbekistan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Vietnam 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Samoa 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Kosovo 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 South Africa 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Zambia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Zimbabwe 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
152 Sierra Leone 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 100.0% falling

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) by country. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-communication-of-tariffs-and-tariff-changes-0-1-db16-20-methodology/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-communication-of-tariffs-and-tariff-changes-0-1-db16-20-methodology/">Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,122 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The communication of tariffs and tariff changes index evaluates whether electricity tariffs are transparent. A score of 1 is assigned if effective tariffs are available online and customers are notified of a change in tariff a full billing cycle (that is, one month) ahead of time. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.