Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology) by country

The communication of tariffs and tariff changes index evaluates whether electricity tariffs are transparent. A score of 1 is assigned if effective tariffs are available online and customers are notified of a change in tariff a full billing cycle (that is, one month) ahead of time. The index is computed based on the...

Countries reporting
183
Highest
1 DB16-20 methodology
Afghanistan
Lowest
0 DB16-20 methodology
Taiwan
Median
1 DB16-20 methodology
Years covered
6
2014–2019
Data points
1,116

What the numbers show

Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology) is currently reported for 183 countries. The highest value is 1 DB16-20 methodology in Afghanistan; the lowest is 0 DB16-20 methodology in Taiwan.

The median across all reporting countries is 1 DB16-20 methodology, and the mean is 0.8087 DB16-20 methodology.

Over the past decade 1 countries rose and 1 fell. The largest increase was in Nigeria (up 29.9%), and the largest decrease in Sierra Leone (down 100.0%).

Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1): full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Afghanistan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Albania 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 United Arab Emirates 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Argentina 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Armenia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Antigua and Barbuda 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Australia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Austria 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Azerbaijan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Burundi 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged falling
1 Belgium 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Benin 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Burkina Faso 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Bulgaria 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Bahrain 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Bahamas 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Belarus 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Belize 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Bolivia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Brazil 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Barbados 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Brunei 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Bhutan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Botswana 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Canada 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Switzerland 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Chile 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 China 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Cote d'Ivoire 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Cameroon 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Colombia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Costa Rica 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Cyprus 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Czechia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Germany 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Djibouti 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Dominica 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Denmark 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Dominican Republic 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Algeria 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Ecuador 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Spain 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Estonia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Finland 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Fiji 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 France 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 United Kingdom 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Georgia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Ghana 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Guinea 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Gambia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Greece 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Grenada 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
1 Guatemala 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Guyana 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Hong Kong 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Honduras 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Croatia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Haiti 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Hungary 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 India 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Ireland 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Iran 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Iceland 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Italy 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Jamaica 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Jordan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Japan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Kazakhstan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Kenya 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Kyrgyzstan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Cambodia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 South Korea 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Kuwait 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Laos 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Lebanon 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Saint Lucia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Sri Lanka 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Lesotho 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Lithuania 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Luxembourg 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Latvia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Morocco 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Moldova 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Madagascar 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Maldives 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Mexico 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Marshall Islands 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 North Macedonia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Malta 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Myanmar 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
1 Montenegro 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Mongolia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Mozambique 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Mauritania 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Mauritius 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Malawi 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Malaysia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Namibia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Niger 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Nigeria 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 29.9% rising
1 Nicaragua 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Netherlands 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Nepal 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 New Zealand 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Oman 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Pakistan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Panama 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Peru 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Palau 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Papua New Guinea 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged falling
1 Poland 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Puerto Rico 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Paraguay 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Palestine 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Romania 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Russia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Rwanda 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Sudan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” rising
1 Senegal 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 El Salvador 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 San Marino 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Serbia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Suriname 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Slovakia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Slovenia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Sweden 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Eswatini 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Syria 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Togo 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Thailand 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Tajikistan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Trinidad and Tobago 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Tunisia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Turkey 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Tanzania 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Uganda 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Ukraine 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Uruguay 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 United States 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Uzbekistan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Vietnam 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Samoa 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Zambia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Zimbabwe 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
149 Angola 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Bangladesh 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Comoros 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Cape Verde 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Egypt 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Ethiopia 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Micronesia (country) 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Gabon 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Guinea-Bissau 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Equatorial Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Indonesia 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Iraq 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Israel 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Kiribati 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Liberia 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Libya 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Mali 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Norway 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Philippines 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Portugal 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Qatar 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Saudi Arabia 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Singapore 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Solomon Islands 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Sierra Leone 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 100.0% falling
149 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Seychelles 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Chad 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 East Timor 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Tonga 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Venezuela 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Vanuatu 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
149 Taiwan 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat

Regions and income groups

Aggregates are excluded from the country ranking above so that a region can never outrank a country.

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 1,116 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The communication of tariffs and tariff changes index evaluates whether electricity tariffs are transparent. A score of 1 is assigned if effective tariffs are available online and customers are notified of a change in tariff a full billing cycle (that is, one month) ahead of time. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.