New Zealand vs Suriname: Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1)
New Zealand
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Suriname
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand rank
1st
Suriname rank
1st
Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) over time
- New Zealand
- Suriname
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Suriname, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1), New Zealand or Suriname?
- New Zealand, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) between New Zealand and Suriname?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Suriname?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Suriname rank globally for getting electricity: communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1)?
- New Zealand ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The communication of tariffs and tariff changes index evaluates whether electricity tariffs are transparent. A score of 1 is assigned if effective tariffs are available online and customers are notified of a change in tariff a full billing cycle (that is, one month) ahead of time. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.