Papua New Guinea vs Uganda: Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1)
Papua New Guinea
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Uganda
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Uganda rank
1st
Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Uganda
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Uganda, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1), Papua New Guinea or Uganda?
- Papua New Guinea, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) between Papua New Guinea and Uganda?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Uganda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Uganda rank globally for getting electricity: communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The communication of tariffs and tariff changes index evaluates whether electricity tariffs are transparent. A score of 1 is assigned if effective tariffs are available online and customers are notified of a change in tariff a full billing cycle (that is, one month) ahead of time. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.