Ecuador vs Iran: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score

Ecuador
67.11
in 2014
Iran
67.01
in 2014
Ecuador rank
117th
Iran rank
118th

Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Ecuador
  • Iran
0204060200920112014

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 67.11 against 67.01 in Iran, a difference of 0.1.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 117th and Iran ranks 118th of 181 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Iran Difference Ahead
2000s 63.63 60.77 2.85 Ecuador
2010s 65.31 62.43 2.88 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Ecuador or Iran?
Ecuador, at 67.11 against 67.01 in Iran as of 2014.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Ecuador and Iran?
0.1, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Iran?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Ecuador and Iran rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
Ecuador ranks 117th and Iran ranks 118th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,098 data points, 2009–2014
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.