Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score in Ecuador

Ecuador: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score was 67.11 in 2014. ▲ Rising

Latest (2014)
67.11
Change on year
up 0.2%
World rank
119th
of 184 countries
All-time high
67.11
in 2014
All-time low
63.63
in 2009
Years of data
6
2009–2014

Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score in Ecuador, 2009–2014

02040602009201120142009: 63.62010: 63.92011: 64.42012: 64.22013: 672014: 67.1

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score in Ecuador stood at 67.11. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is up 0.2% on the previous year and up 5.5% over ten years.

That places Ecuador 119th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.

Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score in Ecuador, 2009 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2009 63.63 —
2010 63.91 +0.4%
2011 64.36 +0.7%
2012 64.21 -0.2%
2013 66.98 +4.3%
2014 67.11 +0.2%

Ecuador compared with similar countries

  • Ecuador's 67.11 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 73.59, 91% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Ecuador's 67.11 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 79.64, 84% of the median. (32 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 63.63 63.63 63.63 1
2010s 65.31 63.91 67.11 5

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 116 Lesotho 68.2 compare
  2. 117 Azerbaijan 67.34 compare
  3. 118 Dominican Republic 67.24 compare
  4. 120 Iran 67.01 compare
  5. 121 Yemen 66.74 compare
  6. 122 China 66.35 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More private sector data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score in Ecuador?
Getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score in Ecuador was 67.11 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 67.11 in 2014.
What is the lowest getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 63.63 in 2009.
How does Ecuador rank for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
Ecuador ranks 119th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is up 5.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score in Ecuador. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-db10-15-methodology-score/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-db10-15-methodology-score/ecuador/">Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,104 data points, 2009–2014
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.