Georgia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Georgia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 90.25 against 88.18 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 2.07.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Georgia ranks 19th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 22nd of 183 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.29 | 87.99 | 13.7 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 83.8 | 88.18 | 4.39 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Georgia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Georgia, at 90.25 against 88.18 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2014.
- What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Georgia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 2.07, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Georgia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
- Georgia ranks 19th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 22nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.