Afghanistan vs Liberia: Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Afghanistan
44.21
in 2019
Liberia
39.07
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
171st
Liberia rank
173rd

Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Liberia
01020304050201420162019

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 44.21 against 39.07 in Liberia, a difference of 5.14.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 171st and Liberia ranks 173rd of 188 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score, Afghanistan or Liberia?
Afghanistan, at 44.21 against 39.07 in Liberia as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score between Afghanistan and Liberia?
5.14, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Liberia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Afghanistan and Liberia rank globally for getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Afghanistan ranks 171st and Liberia ranks 173rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.