Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan

Afghanistan: Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 44.21 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
44.21
Change on year
down 0.7%
World rank
174th
of 191 countries
All-time high
45.63
in 2014
All-time low
44.21
in 2019
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan, 2014–2019

010203040502014201620192014: 45.62015: 45.52016: 452017: 44.62018: 44.52019: 44.2

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score in Afghanistan stood at 44.21. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is down 0.7% on the previous year and down 3.1% over ten years.

That places Afghanistan 174th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan, year by year

Annual values for Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 45.63 —
2015 45.51 -0.3%
2016 45.04 -1.0%
2017 44.58 -1.0%
2018 44.51 -0.1%
2019 44.21 -0.7%

Afghanistan compared with similar countries

  • Afghanistan's 44.21 is above the median for low income countries, which is 36.87, 1.2× the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Afghanistan's 44.21 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 76.25, 58% of the median. (23 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Afghanistan

  1. 171 Guyana 45.9 compare
  2. 172 Malawi 45.38 compare
  3. 173 Kiribati 44.76 compare
  4. 175 Venezuela 39.84 compare
  5. 176 Liberia 39.07 compare
  6. 177 Bangladesh 34.87 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Afghanistan

All data for Afghanistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score in Afghanistan?
Getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score in Afghanistan was 44.21 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Afghanistan?
The highest recorded value was 45.63 in 2014.
What is the lowest getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Afghanistan?
The lowest recorded value was 44.21 in 2019.
How does Afghanistan rank for getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Afghanistan ranks 174th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Afghanistan?
Over the last ten years it is down 3.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-db16-20-methodology-score/afghanistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-db16-20-methodology-score/afghanistan/">Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.