Congo, Rep. vs Sierra Leone: Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Congo, Rep.
32.7
in 2019
Sierra Leone
31.6
in 2019
Congo, Rep. rank
177th
Sierra Leone rank
179th

Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Congo, Rep.
  • Sierra Leone
010203040201420162019

How they compare

Congo, Rep. currently reports 32.7 against 31.6 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 1.1.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Congo, Rep. ahead.

Congo, Rep. ranks 177th and Sierra Leone ranks 179th of 188 countries.

Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score, Congo, Rep. or Sierra Leone?
Congo, Rep., at 32.7 against 31.6 in Sierra Leone as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score between Congo, Rep. and Sierra Leone?
1.1, with Congo, Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Rep. and Sierra Leone?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Congo, Rep. and Sierra Leone rank globally for getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Congo, Rep. ranks 177th and Sierra Leone ranks 179th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.