Djibouti vs South Korea: Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Djibouti
64.57
in 2019
South Korea
99.89
in 2019
Djibouti rank
1st
South Korea rank
2nd

Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Djibouti
  • South Korea
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 99.89 against 64.57 in Djibouti, a difference of 35.32.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.5 times Djibouti's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

Djibouti ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 2nd of 1 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score, Djibouti or South Korea?
South Korea, at 99.89 against 64.57 in Djibouti as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score between Djibouti and South Korea?
35.32, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and South Korea?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Djibouti and South Korea rank globally for getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Djibouti ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 2nd of 1 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.