India vs Sao Tome and Principe: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
India
92.17
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
83.33
in 2019
India rank
29th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
30th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- India
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
India currently reports 92.17 against 83.33 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 8.84.
That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
India ranks 29th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th of 191 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 83.33 | 33.33 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 70.2 | 83.33 | 13.13 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, India or Sao Tome and Principe?
- India, at 92.17 against 83.33 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between India and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 8.84, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do India and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- India ranks 29th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.