Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in Sao Tome and Principe
Sao Tome and Principe: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score was 83.33 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in Sao Tome and Principe, 2009–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Sao Tome and Principe recorded 83.33 for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Sao Tome and Principe peaked at 83.33 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 83.33, in 2009.
That places Sao Tome and Principe 30th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 83.33 | 1 |
| 2010s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 83.33 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Sao Tome and Principe
- 29 India 92.17 compare
- 30 Indonesia 83.33 compare
- 30 Antigua and Barbuda 83.33 compare
- 30 Bhutan 83.33 compare
- 30 Burkina Faso 83.33 compare
- 30 Cambodia 83.33 compare
- 30 Cameroon 83.33 compare
- 30 Croatia 83.33 compare
- 30 Denmark 83.33 compare
- 30 Djibouti 83.33 compare
- 30 Ethiopia 83.33 compare
- 30 Fiji 83.33 compare
- 30 France 83.33 compare
- 30 Ghana 83.33 compare
- 30 Guinea 83.33 compare
- 30 Haiti 83.33 compare
- 30 Iceland 83.33 compare
- 30 Italy 83.33 compare
- 30 Latvia 83.33 compare
- 30 Lebanon 83.33 compare
- 30 Liberia 83.33 compare
- 30 Libya 83.33 compare
- 30 Mali 83.33 compare
- 30 Malta 83.33 compare
- 30 Morocco 83.33 compare
- 30 Mozambique 83.33 compare
- 30 Niger 83.33 compare
- 30 Norway 83.33 compare
- 30 Papua New Guinea 83.33 compare
- 30 Philippines 83.33 compare
- 30 Poland 83.33 compare
- 30 Qatar 83.33 compare
- 30 Rwanda 83.33 compare
- 30 Samoa 83.33 compare
- 30 Singapore 83.33 compare
- 30 Solomon Islands 83.33 compare
- 30 Saint Kitts and Nevis 83.33 compare
- 30 Suriname 83.33 compare
- 30 Tanzania 83.33 compare
- 30 Trinidad and Tobago 83.33 compare
- 30 Tunisia 83.33 compare
- 30 Türkiye 83.33 compare
- 30 Uzbekistan 83.33 compare
- 30 Vanuatu 83.33 compare
- 30 Vietnam 83.33 compare
More private sector data for Sao Tome and Principe
- Merchandise trade 22.5% (2025)
- Food imports 31.8% (2023)
- Manufactures imports 37.1% (2023)
- Merchandise imports 183.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 98.2% (2023)
- Manufactures exports 1.5% (2023)
- Merchandise exports 38.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 75.42 million current US$ (2024)
- Transport services 25.2% (2024)
- Computer, communications and other services 35.9% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Sao Tome and Principe?
- Getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Sao Tome and Principe was 83.33 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting electricity: procedures (number) - score recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The highest recorded value was 83.33 in 2009.
- What is the lowest getting electricity: procedures (number) - score recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The lowest recorded value was 83.33 in 2009.
- How does Sao Tome and Principe rank for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
- Is getting electricity: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Sao Tome and Principe?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Sao Tome and Principe data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.