South Korea vs North Macedonia: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

South Korea
100
in 2019
North Macedonia
100
in 2019
South Korea rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • South Korea
  • North Macedonia
020406080100200920142019

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 100 against 100 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was South Korea ahead.

South Korea ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 188 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 100 83.33 16.67 South Korea
2010s 100 93.33 6.67 South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, South Korea or North Macedonia?
South Korea, at 100 against 100 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between South Korea and North Macedonia?
0, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and North Macedonia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do South Korea and North Macedonia rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
South Korea ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.