Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in South Korea
South Korea: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score was 100 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in South Korea, 2009–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
South Korea recorded 100 for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in South Korea peaked at 100 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 100, in 2009.
South Korea ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in South Korea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 100 | — |
| 2010 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 100 | +0.0% |
South Korea compared with similar countries
- South Korea's 100 is above the median for high income countries, which is 66.67, 1.5× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- South Korea's 100 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 83.33, 1.2× the median. (28 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 100 | 1 |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 100 | 10 |
Countries ranked near South Korea
- 1 China 100 compare
- 1 Russia 100 compare
- 1 Japan 100 compare
- 1 Armenia 100 compare
- 1 Belarus 100 compare
- 1 Comoros 100 compare
- 1 Czechia 100 compare
- 1 Georgia 100 compare
- 1 Germany 100 compare
- 1 Hong Kong 100 compare
- 1 Kenya 100 compare
- 1 Lithuania 100 compare
- 1 Malaysia 100 compare
- 1 Mauritius 100 compare
- 1 Micronesia (country) 100 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 100 compare
- 1 San Marino 100 compare
- 1 Saudi Arabia 100 compare
- 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 100 compare
- 1 Sweden 100 compare
- 1 Switzerland 100 compare
- 1 Taiwan 100 compare
- 1 Thailand 100 compare
- 1 East Timor 100 compare
- 1 Togo 100 compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 100 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 100 compare
More private sector data for South Korea
- Merchandise trade 71.6% (2025)
- Food imports 6.3% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 60.1% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 631.89 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 1.6% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 87.3% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 709.33 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 13,724 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.3788 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 3.76 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in South Korea?
- Getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in South Korea was 100 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting electricity: procedures (number) - score recorded in South Korea?
- The highest recorded value was 100 in 2009.
- What is the lowest getting electricity: procedures (number) - score recorded in South Korea?
- The lowest recorded value was 100 in 2009.
- How does South Korea rank for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- South Korea ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is getting electricity: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in South Korea?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this South Korea data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.