Sao Tome and Principe vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Sao Tome and Principe
83.33
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
83.33
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
30th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
30th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 30th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 83.33 | 83.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Sao Tome and Principe or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Sao Tome and Principe and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 30th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.