Sao Tome and Principe vs Vietnam: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Sao Tome and Principe
83.33
in 2019
Vietnam
83.33
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
30th
Vietnam rank
30th
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Vietnam
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th and Vietnam ranks 30th of 191 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 50 | 33.33 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 83.33 | 61.67 | 21.67 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Sao Tome and Principe or Vietnam?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Vietnam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Sao Tome and Principe and Vietnam?
- 0, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Vietnam?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Vietnam rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 30th and Vietnam ranks 30th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.