Afghanistan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1)
Afghanistan
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
138th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
138th
Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) over time
- Afghanistan
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 138th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 138th of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1), Afghanistan or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Afghanistan, at 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) between Afghanistan and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1)?
- Afghanistan ranks 138th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 138th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The regulatory monitoring index evaluates whether a regulator—that is, an entity separate from the utility—monitors the utility’s performance on reliability of supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the regulator performs periodic or real-time reviews. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.