Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) in Afghanistan

Afghanistan: Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
0 DB16-20 methodology
World rank
138th
of 187 countries
All-time high
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
All-time low
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2016
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) in Afghanistan, 2014–2019

00.20.40.60.812014201620192014: 1 DB16-20 methodology2015: 1 DB16-20 methodology2016: 0 DB16-20 methodology2017: 0 DB16-20 methodology2018: 0 DB16-20 methodology2019: 0 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) in Afghanistan stood at 0 DB16-20 methodology. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.

That places Afghanistan 138th out of 187 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) in Afghanistan, year by year

Annual values for Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology) in Afghanistan, 2014 to 2019.
Year DB16-20 methodology Change
2014 1 DB16-20 methodology
2015 1 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2016 0 DB16-20 methodology -100.0%
2017 0 DB16-20 methodology
2018 0 DB16-20 methodology
2019 0 DB16-20 methodology

Countries ranked near Afghanistan

  1. 137 United States 0.6 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 138 Antigua and Barbuda 0 DB16-20 methodology
  3. 138 Bahrain 0 DB16-20 methodology
  4. 138 Benin 0 DB16-20 methodology
  5. 138 Botswana 0 DB16-20 methodology
  6. 138 Brunei Darussalam 0 DB16-20 methodology
  7. 138 Central African Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology
  8. 138 Chad 0 DB16-20 methodology
  9. 138 Comoros 0 DB16-20 methodology
  10. 138 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology
  11. 138 Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology
  12. 138 Djibouti 0 DB16-20 methodology
  13. 138 Equatorial Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
  14. 138 Ethiopia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  15. 138 Fiji 0 DB16-20 methodology
  16. 138 Grenada 0 DB16-20 methodology
  17. 138 Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
  18. 138 Guinea-Bissau 0 DB16-20 methodology
  19. 138 Haiti 0 DB16-20 methodology
  20. 138 Honduras 0 DB16-20 methodology
  21. 138 Iraq 0 DB16-20 methodology
  22. 138 Kiribati 0 DB16-20 methodology
  23. 138 Kuwait 0 DB16-20 methodology
  24. 138 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology
  25. 138 Lebanon 0 DB16-20 methodology
  26. 138 Liberia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  27. 138 Libya 0 DB16-20 methodology
  28. 138 Madagascar 0 DB16-20 methodology
  29. 138 Maldives 0 DB16-20 methodology
  30. 138 Marshall Islands 0 DB16-20 methodology
  31. 138 Mauritius 0 DB16-20 methodology
  32. 138 Micronesia (country) 0 DB16-20 methodology
  33. 138 Myanmar 0 DB16-20 methodology
  34. 138 Namibia 0 DB16-20 methodology
  35. 138 Nepal 0 DB16-20 methodology
  36. 138 Palau 0 DB16-20 methodology
  37. 138 Paraguay 0 DB16-20 methodology
  38. 138 Puerto Rico 0 DB16-20 methodology
  39. 138 Qatar 0 DB16-20 methodology
  40. 138 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  41. 138 Seychelles 0 DB16-20 methodology
  42. 138 Sierra Leone 0 DB16-20 methodology
  43. 138 Solomon Islands 0 DB16-20 methodology
  44. 138 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 DB16-20 methodology
  45. 138 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 DB16-20 methodology
  46. 138 Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  47. 138 Suriname 0 DB16-20 methodology
  48. 138 Tajikistan 0 DB16-20 methodology
  49. 138 Timor-Leste 0 DB16-20 methodology
  50. 138 Venezuela 0 DB16-20 methodology

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Afghanistan

All data for Afghanistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) in Afghanistan?
Getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) in Afghanistan was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) recorded in Afghanistan?
The highest recorded value was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
What is the lowest getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) recorded in Afghanistan?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2016.
How does Afghanistan rank for getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1)?
Afghanistan ranks 138th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Is getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) rising or falling in Afghanistan?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) in Afghanistan. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-regulatory-monitoring-0-1-db16-20-methodology/afghanistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/getting-electricity-regulatory-monitoring-0-1-db16-20-methodology/afghanistan/">Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) in Afghanistan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,122 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The regulatory monitoring index evaluates whether a regulator—that is, an entity separate from the utility—monitors the utility’s performance on reliability of supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the regulator performs periodic or real-time reviews. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.