Antigua and Barbuda vs Palestine, State of: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff
Antigua and Barbuda
62.5
in 2019
Palestine, State of
62.5
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
90th
Palestine, State of rank
90th
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 62.5 against 62.5 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 90th and Palestine, State of ranks 90th of 191 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff, Antigua and Barbuda or Palestine, State of?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 62.5 against 62.5 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff between Antigua and Barbuda and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Palestine, State of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Palestine, State of rank globally for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 90th and Palestine, State of ranks 90th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.