Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Palestine, State of
Palestine, State of: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff was 62.5 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Palestine, State of, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Palestine, State of stood at 62.5. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 25.0% over ten years.
Palestine, State of ranks 90th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Palestine, State of, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 50 | — |
| 2015 | 62.5 | +25.0% |
| 2016 | 62.5 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 50 | -20.0% |
| 2018 | 62.5 | +25.0% |
| 2019 | 62.5 | +0.0% |
Palestine, State of compared with similar countries
- Palestine, State of's 62.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 37.5, 1.7× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Palestine, State of's 62.5 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 62.5, 1.0× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Palestine, State of
- 90 Pakistan 62.5 compare
- 90 Albania 62.5 compare
- 90 Algeria 62.5 compare
- 90 Antigua and Barbuda 62.5 compare
- 90 Argentina 62.5 compare
- 90 Bahamas 62.5 compare
- 90 Côte d'Ivoire 62.5 compare
- 90 Dominican Republic 62.5 compare
- 90 Egypt 62.5 compare
- 90 Georgia 62.5 compare
- 90 Iran, Islamic Republic of 62.5 compare
- 90 Jamaica 62.5 compare
- 90 Kenya 62.5 compare
- 90 Montenegro 62.5 compare
- 90 North Macedonia 62.5 compare
- 90 Qatar 62.5 compare
- 90 San Marino 62.5 compare
- 90 Senegal 62.5 compare
- 90 Tanzania, United Republic of 62.5 compare
- 90 Türkiye 62.5 compare
- 90 Vanuatu 62.5 compare
More private sector data for Palestine, State of
- Food imports 30.9% (2023)
- Manufactures imports 45.9% (2023)
- Food exports 21.4% (2023)
- Manufactures exports 63.3% (2023)
- Commercial service exports (current US$), per capita 103.2 current US$ per person (2025)
- Commercial service exports 558.70 million current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.0325 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Transport services 47.1% (2025)
- Commercial service imports (current US$), per capita 227.75 current US$ per person (2025)
- Computer, communications and other services 8.6% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Palestine, State of?
- Getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff in Palestine, State of was 62.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Palestine, State of?
- The highest recorded value was 62.5 in 2015.
- What is the lowest getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff recorded in Palestine, State of?
- The lowest recorded value was 50 in 2014.
- How does Palestine, State of rank for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
- Palestine, State of ranks 90th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff rising or falling in Palestine, State of?
- Over the last ten years it is up 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Palestine, State of data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.